The politics of friending with politicans

Now everyone knows that a Facebook friend often isn’t a real friend, or at least it isn’t a pre-requisite. 

But, for journalists, can an ill-advised Facebook encounter be injurious to your career or reputation?  

I’m not talking tales of drunkeness or inappropiate profile pictures, but whether “friending” could lead to accusations of favouritism or influence.

It was a topic that Paul Bradshaw picked up last week when he asked the question, “can journalists be a fan of a politician?”  but was also brought home to me when a local politician attempted to friend me on Facebook recently.

This innoucous act threw me into a bit of a dilemma. I have nothing against this particular person, I know of their activity around Manchester and I know the request is a sincere one as a fellow enthusiast for social media.

But – I don’t actually know the person, have never even had a phone conversation never mind met in person. Then again, there are plenty of other people who I’ve only ever ‘met’ online and who have become regular conversationalists across Fbook, Twitter et al.

So what to do?

I first contacted the person and asked them how they know me. I got a completely charming reply explaining interest in the Social Media Cafe and blogging activity I’m involved in and also expressing an understanding of the difficult position this request might have caused.

So am I being over-sensitive and a bit prissy about the whole thing?

After all, journalists and politicians have always been in close contact, we wouldn’t have any lobby reporting without it.

Why should the openness of an an online network with all its declared allegiances on display be more problematic than some shady old drinking den where (state-school educated female hacks like myself have a tendency to believe) men who used to “fag” hangout and entertain themselves with funny handshakes?

Now don’t get me wrong, it certainly isn’t the openness of the situation that’s giving me the problem, it’s the potential for the simple action of accepting the request being seen as a warts-and-all endorsement for the individual, the party they support, any causes they attach to etc. coming as part of the package.

It may well be that I do agree/support etc, it’s just that I feel it would impact on my impartiality as a journalist to give out such a blanket approval.

So for now it’s a ‘no’ to friending – although the conversation the request prompted between us may lead to a meeting offline at some point in the future.

What would you do, or have you done? I’d love to hear from any other journalists, or politicians, who’ve considered this issue.

3 thoughts on “The politics of friending with politicans

  1. JTownend's avatar

    I also think different people treat Facebook and Twitter differently: some see ‘friending’ or linking up on Facebook as equivalent to following on Twitter and no need for a personal connection or genuine friendship. Everyone draws their etiquette lines in different places! What about random LinkedIn requests? To accept or not to accept?

    Like

  2. Paul's avatar

    I would advocate journalists having two Facebook profiles – one for proper friends, one for contacts.

    Being friends with politicians can give you news tips, but that probably doesn’t outweigh the potential harm of being seen to be favouring one party over another.

    A reporter who covers a particular patch should add as many people who live in the town as possible to their professional Facebook profile.

    It gives people another way of contacting them with a story, and an RSS feed of all those friends’ activities would throw up loads of news leads.

    Like

  3. Craig McGill's avatar

    Journalists have since the early days been friendly with people from all areas of employment, but there are a few things to consider:

    1) some will say that in this web2.0 era you should be all transparent about who you know and who your contacts are (I believe this to be impractical and impossible for a number of professional reasons)

    2) If you are linked to a politico and then a story they are involved with breaks from you – they may then become prime suspect for the leak, even if they had nothing to do with it. Guilt by association.

    I don’t think the acceptance would be seen as an endorsement though.

    Like

Leave a reply to JTownend Cancel reply

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close